View Comments

Proportionality in Gaza

By Christian Barry, Matt Peterson | Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics, Public Ethics Media | January 27, 2009

Loading the player...

Right-click here to download.

Out of some 1,300 Palestinians killed in Gaza, Israel claims that it can name more than 700 of the dead who were Hamas fighters. Claiming precise knowledge of their targets, Israeli officials insist that their attacks were judiciously planned so as to minimize harm to civilians. Despite this apparent caution, however, it is almost impossible to avoid civilian deaths during military operations on urbanized terrain.

In this Public Ethics Radio broadcast, Jeff McMahan discusses the role that civilian casualties play in assessing the justice of war.

For a war to be just, it must satisfy what is known as the proportionality principle. In a disproportionate war, the harms caused by going to war are so evil that they outweigh the benefits of an otherwise worthy goal. Considerations of proportionality are also relevant to the assessment of particular tactics undertaken in an ongoing war.

Creative Commons License
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Please read our usage policy.

Read More: Cities, Ethics, Human Rights, Poverty, Religion, Security, Israel, Palestine, Middle East

blog comments powered by Disqus

Site Search

Global Research Engine

This search includes our Core Network partners.

Join Our Mailing Lists

The Journal