Policy Innovations The central address for a fairer globalization

A publication of the Carnegie Council

Text Size: A A   Print Page Mail Page Bookmark and Share
View Comments

Pro-Poor Development: Distribution, Growth and Policy Interactions

By J. Mohan Rao

February 1, 2002

This paper explores the main lines of interaction between growth and distribution to shed light on the potential for pro-poor growth. The historical record over the last twenty years indicates that standard stabilization and adjustment policies, based on the Washington Consensus, have been successful in neither fostering growth nor promoting equity in a majority of developing countries. Problems have arisen in the short run primarily due to an inflexible stance on inflation and public sector deficits preventing the full recovery of both private investment and complementary public investment. Problems in the longer term are due both to excessive faith in the efficacy of markets to deliver growth and poverty reduction and to adjustment with anaemic investment. Pro-poor growth must involve more growth oriented (or investment-stimulating) stabilization policies in the short run and more poverty-reducing egalitarian adjustment policies in the long run compared to most prevalent policy regimes.

Download File (180.00 K)

Read More: Development, Economy, Environment, Governance, Poverty

blog comments powered by Disqus

Site Search

Newsletter Signup

Please enter your email address to subscribe.

TWITTER

Follow us on Twitter.
> Go

FACEBOOK

Become a friend on Facebook.
> Go

PODCAST

Subscribe to the Carnegie Council Podcast.
> Go

RSS Feed

Subscribe to our RSS Feed.
> Go

Global Research Engine

This search includes our partner sites:

Audio / Video

02/06/12

Andreas Mershin

Solar Cells Built from Plant Waste

02/03/12

Philippe Burke

Inequality in the United States

01/31/12

Thomas Pogge

ETHICS MATTER: A Conversation with Thomas Pogge

01/30/12

Bjarke Ingels

Hedonistic Sustainability

01/20/12

Ian Bremmer, Art Kleiner

Top Risks and Ethical Decisions 2012