Policy Innovations
IDEAS INNOVATORS EVENTS ABOUT US SUPPORT US
 
Ideas
  Innovations
  Briefings
  Commentary
  Audio/Video
  Policy Library
  Blogs
  Search Engine
  Newsfeeds
 
 

SEARCH CORE NETWORK

This search includes our partner sites:

SEARCH OUR SITE

 
 

NEWSLETTER SIGN-UP

Please enter your email address to subscribe to our email newsletter.
 
 
 
RSS FEED
  Subscribe to our RSS Feed.
> More

TWITTER
Twitter icon
  Follow us on Twitter.
> Go

 
 
MOST EMAILED PAGES
1. The Triumphant Return of John Maynard Keynes
2. The New Science of Sustainable Dynamics
3. Time Out
4. The Positive Deviance Initiative Story
5. China Rediscovers Ethics in Foreign Policy
 
Print Page Mail Page
View Comments
     
 

Winners and Losers: Impact of the Doha Round on Developing Countries

By Sandra Polaski

 
 

January 1, 2006

Sandra Polaski
Carnegie Enwoment for International Peace (CEIP), 2006.
DESCRIPTION

Meeting in Hong Kong in December 2005, trade ministers from World Trade Organization member countries were unable to bridge major disagreements in virtually every area of the Doha Round negotiations. As the global trade regime has expanded to include most developing countries, the range of divergent priorities within the negotiations has widened. What would it take to produce a global trade agreement that addresses the interests of developing countries and holds the potential to lift their incomes, while at the same time offering advantages for developed countries?
Winners and Losers: Impact of the Doha Round on Developing Countries presents a new, path breaking model of global trade as a tool to analyze the potential impacts of the negotiations and underlying economic interests of the WTO’s diverse members. This new Carnegie model makes several critical innovations—notably, modeling unemployment in developing countries and separating agricultural labor markets from urban unskilled labor markets. The result is a thorough, detailed, and more accurate analysis of the impact of trade policies on both developing and developed countries.
The report’s major findings are striking: any of the plausible trade scenarios will produce only modest gains for the world; agricultural trade is not a panacea for most poor countries; the poorest countries may actually lose from any agreement; and additional special measures will be needed to ensure that the least developed countries succeed. The full document includes technical specifications of the Carnegie model, simulation results, a wealth of regional and national data, over 50 full color charts and graphs, policy implications and recommendations.


Download File (1.56 M)

External Link: http://www.carnegieendowment.org/publications/index...

blog comments powered by Disqus

 
 

RELATED

Biography:
Sandra Polaski
 
Organization:
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (CEIP)
 
Keywords:
Agriculture, Development, Globalization, Governance, Jobs, Poverty
 
 
 
BLOG
Credit: Krzysztof J. Kokowicz, Lublin, Poland (First Place, Carnegie Council Poster Contest, Global Social Justice Category).
FAIRER GLOBALIZATION
Reflections on articles and events related to Policy Innovations.
 
 

AUDIO / VIDEO

01/05/09
Christian Barry, Meg Boulware, Laura Herman, Maggie Kohn, Rohit Malpani, Lisa Oldring
Health as a Human Right
 
01/05/09
David Singh Grewal, Christian Barry
Network Power
 
01/05/09
Sarah Burd-Sharps, Kristen Lewis
The Measure of America
 
12/18/08
Devin Stewart, Joshua Eisenman, Jonathan Gage, Harry Harding
Beijing Delegation
 
12/05/08
Larry S. Temkin
Extending Human Lifespans
 

PODCAST
Carnegie Council Podcast
Subscribe to
Policy Innovations audio via the Carnegie Council Podcast.


 
   SITE MAP    HELP    LEGAL