Policy Innovations The central address for a fairer globalization

A publication of the Carnegie Council

Text Size: A A   Print Page Mail Page Bookmark and Share
View Comments

Yuan Revaluation Debate

By Devin T. Stewart

Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs, January 1, 2007

Asia’s growth is impacting global financial relations, but the debate about the Chinese currency, like that about the Japanese yen two decades ago, may be oversimplified. The battle over revaluing the yuan has big implications for the U.S. economy, U.S.-China relations, and the U.S.’s global leadership role. The highly integrated nature of the U.S. and Chinese economies – and a growing portion of the world for that matter – makes predicting the effect of a revaluation difficult. Some analysts believe that a revaluation would help cool down the Chinese economy, increase the buying power of the Chinese consumer, allow Southeast Asian nations to compete with China in areas such as textiles, and reduce China’s overall trade surplus. Others believe that revaluation would reduce China’s growth rate, increase the number of China’s bad loans, increase unemployment, reward currency speculators, and set into motion a deflationary an recessionary spiral similar to that of Japan in the 1990s.

Download File (PDF, 284.64 K)

Read More: Economy, China, Japan, United States, Asia

blog comments powered by Disqus

Site Search

Newsletter Signup

Please enter your email address to subscribe.

TWITTER

Follow us on Twitter.
> Go

FACEBOOK

Become a friend on Facebook.
> Go

PODCAST

Subscribe to the Carnegie Council Podcast.
> Go

RSS Feed

Subscribe to our RSS Feed.
> Go

Global Research Engine

This search includes our partner sites:

Audio / Video

02/06/12

Andreas Mershin

Solar Cells Built from Plant Waste

02/03/12

Philippe Burke

Inequality in the United States

01/31/12

Thomas Pogge

ETHICS MATTER: A Conversation with Thomas Pogge

01/30/12

Bjarke Ingels

Hedonistic Sustainability

01/20/12

Ian Bremmer, Art Kleiner

Top Risks and Ethical Decisions 2012