View Comments

Rethinking the Economics of Capital Mobility and Capital Controls

By Thomas Palley | Political Economy Research Institute | February 10, 2009

This Working Paper reexamines the issue of international financial capital mobility, which has become today's economic orthodoxy. The policy discussion is often framed in terms of the impossible trinity. That framing distorts discussion by representing capital mobility as having equal significance with sovereign monetary policy and control over exchange rates. It also distorts discussion by ignoring possibilities for coordinated monetary policy and exchange rates, and for managed capital flows. The case for capital mobility rests on neoclassical economic efficiency arguments and neoliberal political arguments. The case against capital mobility is based on Keynesian macroeconomic inefficiency arguments, neo-Walrasian market failure arguments, and neo-Marxian arguments regarding distortion of the social structure of accumulation. Close examination shows the case for capital mobility to be extremely flimsy. That points to the ideological dimension behind today's policy orthodoxy.

External Link: Rethinking the Economics of Capital Mobility and Capital Controls

Read More: Business, Debt, Economy, Finance, Globalization, Governance, United States, Americas, Global

blog comments powered by Disqus

Site Search

Global Research Engine

This search includes our Core Network partners.

Join Our Mailing Lists

The Journal