View Comments

Human Engineering and Climate Change

February 2, 2012

CREDIT: Trey Ratcliff (CC).

By S. Matthew Liao, Anders Sandberg, and Rebecca Roache

ABSTRACT: Anthropogenic climate change is arguably one of the biggest problems that confront us today. There is ample evidence that climate change is likely to affect adversely many aspects of life for all people around the world, and that existing solutions such as geoengineering might be too risky and ordinary behavioral and market solutions might not be sufficient to mitigate climate change.

In this paper, we consider a new kind of solution to climate change, what we call human engineering, which involves biomedical modifications of humans so that they can mitigate and/or adapt to climate change. We argue that human engineering is potentially less risky than geoengineering and that it could help behavioral and market solutions succeed in mitigating climate change. We also consider some possible ethical concerns regarding human engineering such as its safety, the implications of human engineering for our children and for the society, and we argue that these concerns can be addressed. Our upshot is that human engineering deserves further consideration in the debate about climate change.

Ethics, Policy and the Environment 15 (2) 2012: 206–221

External Link: Human Engineering and Climate Change [PDF]

Read More: Culture, Energy, Environment, Ethics, Health, Human Rights, Innovation, Science, Sustainability, Technology

blog comments powered by Disqus

Site Search

Global Research Engine

This search includes our Core Network partners.

Join Our Mailing Lists

The Journal