Policy Innovations
IDEAS INNOVATORS EVENTS ABOUT US SUPPORT US
 
Ideas
  Innovations
  Briefings
  Commentary
  Audio/Video
  Policy Library
  Blogs
  Research Engine
  Newsfeeds
 
 

GLOBAL RESEARCH ENGINE

This search includes our partner sites:

SITE SEARCH

 
 

NEWSLETTER SIGN-UP

Please enter your email address to subscribe to our email newsletter.
 
 
 
RSS FEED
  Subscribe to our RSS Feed.
> More

TWITTER
Twitter icon
  Follow us on Twitter.
> Go

FACEBOOK
  Become a fan on Facebook.
> Go

 
 
MOST EMAILED PAGES
1. Confronting Culture in Congo
2. Leadership as Practical Ethics
3. The Evolution of Revolution
4. Conservation and Governance
5. Jean Drèze
 
Print Page Mail Page Bookmark and Share
View Comments
     
 

Mitigation of Climate Change

SUMMARY FOR POLICYMAKERS

 
 

May 4, 2007

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 4th Report, Working Group III

Four main criteria are used to evaluate policies and instruments: environmental effectiveness, cost effectiveness, distributional effects, including equity, and institutional feasibility.
  • Integrating climate policies in broader development policies makes implementation and overcoming barriers easier.
  • Regulations and standards generally provide some certainty about emission levels. They may be preferable to other instruments when information or other barriers prevent producers and consumers from responding to price signals. However, they may not induce innovations and more advanced technologies.
  • Taxes and charges can set a price for carbon, but cannot guarantee a particular level of emissions. Literature identifies taxes as an efficient way of internalizing costs of GHG emissions.
  • Tradable permits will establish a carbon price. The volume of allowed emissions determines their environmental effectiveness, while the allocation of permits has distributional consequences. Fluctuation in the price of carbon makes it difficult to estimate the total cost of complying with emission permits.
  • Financial incentives (subsidies and tax credits) are frequently used by governments to stimulate the development and diffusion of new technologies. While economic costs are generally higher than for the instruments listed above, they are often critical to overcome barriers.
  • Voluntary agreements between industry and governments are politically attractive, raise awareness among stakeholders, and have played a role in the evolution of many national policies. The majority of agreements has not achieved significant emissions reductions beyond business as usual. However, some recent agreements, in a few countries, have accelerated the application of best available technology and led to measurable emission reductions.
  • Information instruments (e.g. awareness campaigns) may positively affect environmental quality by promoting informed choices and possibly contributing to behavioural change, however, their impact on emissions has not been measured yet.
  • RD&D can stimulate technological advances, reduce costs, and enable progress toward stabilization.

Download: Mitigation of Climate Change (PDF, 783.29 K)

blog comments powered by Disqus

 
 

RELATED

Keywords:
Development, Economy, Energy, Environment, Governance
 
Region:
Global
 
 
 
BLOG
Credit: Krzysztof J. Kokowicz, Lublin, Poland (First Place, Carnegie Council Poster Contest, Global Social Justice Category).
FAIRER GLOBALIZATION
Reflections on articles and events related to Policy Innovations.
 
 

AUDIO / VIDEO

03/10/10
Khaled Dawoud
Press Freedom in the Arab World
 
03/02/10
Workshop for Ethics in Business
Global Jobs Update
 
02/18/10
Bill Gates
Innovating to Zero
 
02/11/10
Peter Eigen
How to Expose Corruption
 
02/01/10
George Friedman
Obama's Foreign Policy: What Matters and What Doesn't for America
 

PODCAST
Carnegie Council Podcast
Subscribe to
Policy Innovations audio via the Carnegie Council Podcast.


 
   SITE MAP    HELP    LEGAL